marketing

You are currently browsing articles tagged marketing.

Something I’ve been thinking about for a while, but was really catalyzed by Fred Wilson’s excellent blog post today: With the advent of check ins (and the related possibility that emerges from this) at physical locations facilitated by Foursquare, et al., why have we not seen this applied to Web Sites?

Certainly, it’s a good sign to see email-for-content widgets being the transactional element of choice for gaining the all-important currency of email sign ups (as I discussed in my post, “The New Report Card“). However, I think people are still missing an opportunity.

If (as I do) you believe in the customer journey approach, you know that you fail if – after all the energy and expense related to getting a customer to your site – the customer visits your site once, and never again.

You must compel people to visit more than once.

The customer journey is: awareness, consideration, inquiry, purchase, repurchase. The all-important element is “repurchase.” Again, without repurchase, you fail.

So, we need to compel people to visit over and over. To do this, we have to create value propositions. As offline businesses are discovering, one of these value propositions is the frequency-related “currency” one acquires from being a regular (“Norm!!“); in the parlance of Foursquare, a “Mayor.”

It makes no sense, therefore, that I can’t become the “Mayor” of some site that I visit over and over. The logical progression is that once I build this frequency-related currency, I can potentially receive value adds beyond being dubbed “Mayor” of the Site. (Just to be clear: I’m not saying the Foursquare should do this. Rather, web sites should create their own frequency-related rewards and currency.)

This frequency-related value-add could be free songs, additional access, tickets, whatever.

I would encourage people to think in terms of celebrating the passionate user.

As we move towards more subscription-based revenue, it will become increasingly important to celebrate the people who sign up for these services. I would suggest profiling the users who sign up on the subscription page of the site; interview them, etc. PopCandy celebrates her readers brilliantly.

So…let’s remember The Straddle: look around for these offline things that are working, and find ways to bring it online, and vice versa.

By the way, I fully expect people to tell me that this is already happening. I hope so.

And now…XTC:

Tags: ,

I still wake up on Wednesdays with a little shudder. You see, Wednesdays are (and, I guess, always will be) soundscan days. Back when there was still a record business, you got your report card every Wednesday morning. I remember so well hauling my pale ass out of bed and using the sweet dial up modem to log in to SS. 90% of the time, this was immediately followed by an “ugh.” The numbers were rarely what you wanted them to be (for more on SS’s continued irrelevance, read this).

Numbers indelibly etched in my brain, off to the office I’d go. I’d hit the fax (yes, fax) machine to look for the radio and press reports from the indies, and check my inbox (and by that I mean a little box in which paper reports were inserted) for internal press and radio reports. Ugh. Ugh.

Wednesdays sucked!

And, typically (almost always) with each subsequent week after the initial numbers, Wednesdays sucked exponentially more. You see, 99% of the time, the only week you might have any type of non-ugh reaction over SS numbers and other reports was that first week.

From there the numbers tended to drop precipitously. In fact, it was often considered a win if your SS numbers only halved from week 1 to week 2. Same with the other reports: radio and press (linked, and, in many respects, taking their cues from SS) tended to start with optimism (“So and so from such and such magazine/newspaper/radio station really likes the record, and promises to listen!!!”), and got increasingly depressing (“So and so says they’re on deadline/add week, but they’re going to try to listen;” “So and so doesn’t really dig it/feel the heat/will give it a review instead of a feature/will try it on the specialty show, but won’t add yet”).

Here’s roughly what the report card looked like:

What my scrawl is saying is that in week 1 if your SS number was 1000, by week 2 you’d often decrease that number by 75% (so, from 1k down to 250); the press and radio interest would decrease by half. Week 3 would continue apace with your SS numbers being a tenth (in this case, 100) of the first week, while radio and press interest was 25% of what it had been in week one. This is probably a little dramatic in order to make a point, but it’s not that dramatic, and this is, sadly, often exactly what it looked/looks like).

Can you imagine how hard it became to do this week after week? Don’t get me wrong, I (and many more others) had weeks where the SS numbers went up, press went crazy, radio added the song, etc. But, for every one of these, there were literally dozens where it went the way I described above.

Just from a psychological standpoint, it caused a ton of psychic torment; rather than being excited and finding ways to create energy and positivity about a project, you were left sugar coating: “The numbers weren’t that bad;” “Hey, we laid a foundation for the next record.”

This type of laying it on thick was particularly important in terms of artist relations. You had to present things in some sort of positive light to artists or they’d lose their minds; they’d just spent many moons and much blood, sweat, and tears creating a piece of art, and entrusted it to you, and to tell them that the general response to their work was, “meh” was simply cruel. (In hindsight, it was equally cruel to sugar coat, but I wasn’t as evolved as I am now (hah!)).

In any case, as the negativity began to become almost endemic, the process became surreal: what were we doing? What is real?

Happily, we have a new report card, and it’s sort of the inverse of the above.

Below is a quick (I know, given the looks of it, it’s hard to believe that I didn’t labor over it; I have a gift) list of some of what I feel are the more important elements that should be on your new report card.

[The legend to my map: email addresses; twitter followers; Facebook fans; Google Analytics (you should look at visitors, time on site, bounce rate, etc. Also, you should be looking at Google Alerts); downloads; subscriptions (i.e. people subscribing to some offering, ala Kristin Hersh's Strange Angels). The calculation is just an example. Here, I've got week 1 as "X," and the subsequent weeks' numbers increasing by 20, 30 and 40% of X. So, if week one, you have 100 email subscribers, by week 2 you want 120, and so forth. This is arbitrary. You should set whatever goals are difficult but attainable, and you should adjust as the weeks go by.]

Couple of things to note: 1. You can do this daily. 2. You should measure what I’ve suggested, but you should also have your own things you’re measuring; I’m sure I’ve left off some obvious things (one thing I’d love to be able to measure is how effectively your music is being shared, I know Topspin is making some great strides with this; another is gig attendees/number of gigs played – you need to measure this!).

The big distinction, however, between the old skool report card and the new skool report card is the shift from pessimism to optimism it represents.

Where the old skool report axiomatically led to depression due to the inexorable decline in numbers (SS, reviews, spins), the new skool report axiomatically leads to hope (and thus energy): if you haven’t increased – even by a teeny bit – your email subscribers, etc., something is wrong.

The good news now is that once you realize that something is wrong you can take strides to fix it.

Not getting enough email subscribers? Do you have an email-for-content widget rocking on your site; have you done what you need in terms of SEO to make sure people know you have a site; are you leveraging Twitter or FB to go to where people already are congregating and giving them a decent value proposition to go to your site; etc.

You know what your “remedy” was for bad ss numbers? Spend more co-op dollars. Fuck. Bad radio numbers? Payola. Double Fuck. Bad press? Cry. Sigh.

Again, the real beauty of this new type of report card is that it should be exciting and encouraging. You can see incremental progress, and, most importantly, you (band, manager) are in control.

This is vastly different than placing your hopes/destiny in the hands of a sales rep, publicist, promo person, label.

You note that nowhere on this new report card is a category for radio play or press reviews. You know why? They don’t matter. Yes, a teeny bit of an exaggeration, but even if they might matter a bit (and, really, only for artists who are already established) – you largely can’t control them. Please focus on what you can control. I did, by the way put Google Alerts as a measurement; think of this as your press report, and when you see that someone blogged about your work (via Google Alerts), respond/comment, etc. Remember, markets are conversations/relationships.

In a comment to my earlier post about The Leveling I was gently criticized for not supplying specific enough instruction in my writing. Well, as much as I agree with Mr. Godin’s statement about not drawing maps, I guess this is an attempt at something resembling a map.

Map:
What you have to do is figure out what you need to measure (I’ve tried to give you some ideas). This should lead to an overall strategy (i.e. big picture goals), and this should lead to action plans (i.e. small, daily steps that help you hit those goals).

Don’t try to go from 0 email subscribers to 1000 in a week, and then deem it a failure when/if you don’t hit that. Try to go from 0 to 25 in a week. Before you can get any, you have to do some work (as above, email-for-content widget, SEO, etc. – these are elements of an action plan that lead to success at a strategy of getting more email subscribers).

Measure your progress weekly. Use a google sheet that can be updated each week. Have a band meeting and look at the numbers. Assess what’s working, and what’s not. Where things are working, there is energy; do more. Where things aren’t (no addition of FB fans, etc.), figure out what actions you can take to change it.

Do this for three months, you’ll be shocked by the results.

Tags: , ,

Hugh MacLeod of Gapingvoid.com and the soon-to-be-published Ignore Everybody: and 39 Other Keys to Creativity tells it like it is in a recent interview:

“Artists cannot market” is complete crap. Warhol was GREAT at marketing. As was Picasso and countless other “Blue Chips”. Of course, they’d often take the “anti-marketing” stance as a form of marketing themselves. And their patrons lapped it up.

The way artists market themselves is by having a great story, by having a “Myth”. Telling anecdotal stories about Warhol, Pollack, Basquiat, Van Gogh is both (A) fun and (B) has a mythical dimension… if they didn’t, they wouldn’t have had movies made about them. The art feeds the myth. The myth feeds the art.

The worst thing an artist can do is see marketing as “The Other”, i.e. something outside of themselves. It’s not.

I’m the proud owner of, “The Bluetrain,” one Mr. MacLeod’s prints:

(Gotta get that booger hung and framed; get your own at Mr. MacLeod’s Gallery.)

I highly recommend you read the whole interview. A lot of it aligns with my recent rant during the Artists House live webcast, where I implored those watching not to wait around for the “Industry” or “Hand of God” to come pluck you out of anonymity (FF to about 10 minutes in for said rant).

While Mr. MacLeod is speaking about visual art, methinks it applies to music too:

Rich patrons are nice, but… (A) there aren’t too many of them and (B), “Get in line, Dude”. It’s not like you’re the only one who thought of that business model. New York and London are FULL of young, aspiring hopefuls, just waiting for Charles Saatchi or some celebrity to come along, “discover” them, and make their Hollywood Ending a reality.

And as statistically unlikely the Hollywood Ending may be, even if your plan works, it can still come back and bite you in the ass. A friend of a friend, an artist, sold a sizable chunk of her work to Charles Saatchi a couple of years ago. She thought she was set for life. Then Mr Saatchi went ahead and sold it all back a year later. Her prices plummeted. In one fell swoop, Saatchi’s action had pretty much marked her forehead with an “X” for life. Nice try, Ma’am, but… Piss off. She was very bitter about it.

As Hugh would say, “Rock On!”

Tags: , ,

We inch closer. Something’s going on, and it’s starting to emerge. I’ve been prattling on about it for eons, but we’re starting – just starting – to see a big important shift in the music business that will move us closer to a workable system.

What?

Yeah: labels, content holders, etc. are starting to realize that it makes sense to sell their content from everywhere, rather than limit it to a few online retailers (iTunes, Amazonmp3, etc.).

This is spurred on somewhat by the ability to reduce transaction costs.

More, however, by a growing psychological understanding (finally) of how the Internet works.

Smart ones are (finally) realizing, you can’t create a community; they already exist. All you can do is identify them, and put your crap in front of them, and then – in the words of this dude – provide elegant organization.

All of a sudden, those who have given people a reason to show up — because they’re a trusted source/a filter — become real powerful.

Not there (quite) yet, but soon come.

Tags: , , ,

I’ve been chronicling the development of the UStream chats we’ve recently been working on.

You gotta get on this action if you haven’t tried. Just build up your Tribe a little bit (you know: Twitter, FB, your blog) then start talking.

Think of it this way: you’re at a bar, you’re shooting the shit with someone, and you hit on a topic that makes you pause and say, “Do you have the other half of this locket?” In other words, you find that shared interest that tells you both you’re members of the same Tribe. That shared interest is a social object.

Often this is music or art of some kind; some obscure book, movie, record that you thought you and only you loved, and then you realize the person you’re talking to has the same appreciation of this…what…social object.

Get it?

It’s not the thing – the thing doesn’t matter – it’s the fact that you are connected by this thing.

I remember so well my freshman year of college, having come from a cultural vacuum of epic proportions to a place where I wasn’t the only one who had a giant poster of this on my wall:

You think that seeing this poster on someone else’s wall didn’t bind me to this person? You think it didn’t lead to the formation of a Tribe? You think it didn’t lead to countless multi-guitar renditions of “Driver 8?” You think it didn’t lead to more album/merch/ticket sales for REM?

You think Chronic Town isn’t still a social object? This came across my Twitter transom the other day:

Now, I don’t know Mr. Kaplan personally, but a Tweet like this one certainly makes me want to know him, do some work together, etc. Again, it ain’t the object, it’s how it connects people.

So, building that Tribe allows you to then use UStream to create something approximating that space you inhabit when you’re at the bar shooting the shit. The conversation is sort of the meta social object. Hopefully others emerge during the course of the conversation. If they don’t, watch out. Something’s not right.

Of course, a UStream chat is not the same as being in a bar. But, if you approach it from the standpoint of markets being a conversation, it gets pretty darn close.

With our UStream deals we’re trying to have a conversation – speak in an authentic voice.

Think of it this way (paraphrasing Doc Searls), when an artist is selling a CD after their gig at a merch table, what (ideally) is that process like? Well, it should be a conversation. The person walking up to the merch table should end up conversing with the artist. At the end of the conversation what should happen? A purchase of the CD, merch, etc. So…markets are conversations, and the purchase is simply the exclamation point at the end. The CD that is purchased? The social object, of course. The punctuation at the end of our UStream conversations is when people go to the Artists House site and watch videos, etc. Oh, and there will be more ways to punctuate coming up soon.

I’m getting ready to dive into a new project for Wolfgang’s Vault where I’ll be putting my ass on the line to try and make this work for some of the most important music ever created. First steps: Identify some social objects and start conversations. More on this soon.

A lot here (or maybe a little). Disjointed. Sorry. Need to edit. Don’t feel like it (it’s a blog, not a scholarly journal for fuck’s sake).

I’m going to be talking about social objects on our next Artists House UStream broadcast. We’ll do this next Wednesday (the 18th) at a new time: 6pm central.

Here’s last week’s conversation. If you’re keeping score at home, we went from 50 viewers the first week, to 100 the second, to over 150 for this most recent one. Hells to the yeah.

Tags: , , , , ,

« Older entries § Newer entries »