September 2007

You are currently browsing the monthly archive for September 2007.

ffffound image

Ffffound! is sort of like del.icio.us, but for images.

While this is a neat idea, in and of itself, what I find compelling about it is that – as yet – it’s a fairly closed network, and thus the quality level is very high. As a member you’re only given one invite.

I very much enjoy just trolling through the images that the members have collected, and – again, because Ffffound! tightly controls who gets to put images up – I’m not inundated with a bunch of crap when I browse.

It has me thinking: could a concept like this work for music.

I’ve been blathering away for a while now about how I believe the future of the music business is bloggers (or other “mavens”/filters/whatever) being set up in a manner to not only expose people to the music they love and write about, but to be compensated for doing so (via a piece of the purchase price), and given incentive to do so because the back-end system insures that the artists will receive their fair share as well.

We’re starting to see this emerge in little fits and starts. It’ll get there. I’m actively working on getting it there myself via a number of projects.

However, I think that a music version of Ffffound! might just have some worth; i.e., instead of the users putting up the images they come across and find compelling, they post mp3s of the music.

If it truly is a controlled group of people – not the madding crowd – all of whom have a vested interest in keeping the system operating at a high level (and thus use some discretion with their one invite), you could create an amazingly varied and high-level collection of music.

Something for me to ponder. Thoughts?

I’m very excited to see where Greg Rodrigue’s new venture, Community Records, goes.

Greg is the mastermind behind the New Orleans Ska band Fatter Than Albert, and has deep understanding of music and the music business. I’m certain what he comes up with will be artist-centric and innovative.

Very nice to have some people weigh in on the music industry who don’t have a vested interest in hammering the same. old. tired. doggerel – downloads, whine, p2p, whine, lack of quality artists, whine.

Not to say that I agree with everything presented here, just a bit of a autumnal breeze through the desert.

Link.

wes anderson

In a decent piece on the director Wes Anderson in New York magazine, Mr. Anderson is quoted as asking his collaborators: “Okay, am I doing too much of a ‘thing I do’ here?”

All I can say is…keep doing what you do.

I get so bothered by people/critics who take pokes at artists whose work is so idiosyncratic that it’s clearly neither meant for nor going to appeal to everyone. At this point, you should definitively know if the movies of Wes Anderson are for you or not. If not…cool. I just see no reason to critique this type of art. I’ve heard people, for instance, complain about Coen Brothers movies, or even Hitchcock, or Woody Allen.

It applies to music, of course, too. Not crazy about some of Dylan’s records? The new Magnetic Fields not doing it for you? Uh, ok. Perhaps you just shouldn’t bother, but please don’t critique.

I feel that even the “worst” work of these types of artists is better than 99.9999% of the alternatives.

We should be grateful these people are making the art they make. The alternatives ain’t so good.

Sorry for the rant.

amazon mp3 logo

[9/26 update: some very good summations on the recent launch of amazonmp3:

/update]

This could provide serious competition to iTunes. You can download the tracks from AmazonMP3 at 256kbps, and they’re DRM-free (so they work on your iPod or any other digital player).

The lack of DRM means that Amazon MP3 has only a 2mm song inventory, which is a long way from the massive catalog on iTunes. However, I think this is the first real pressure that the labels will face when it comes to DRM.

My question is, why did it take Amazon so long?

[update]

I’ve been fooling around with the AmazonMP3 store for a little while now. I’m more convinced than ever that it’s going to present a serious threat to iTunes. First off, they’ve integrated the AmazonMP3 store very nicely with iTunes. For example, when you purchase a song or album from the AmazonMP3 store, it automatically downloads into your iTunes app on your computer (complete with artwork). This obviates the need to have separate players – smart.

Second, and perhaps most crucially, the variable pricing is a big deal, and prominently featured throughout the store. I’ve spent quite a bit of time perusing the albums priced under $5.00. There’s a pretty amazing selection of stuff. In about ten minutes of browsing, I bought a couple live Miles and Coltrane recordings (neither available on iTunes), a Neutral Milk Hotel record, and debated over a handful of others.

In terms of comparison, I did find the Thelonious Monk with John Coltrane record on both iTunes and AmazonMP3 priced at the irresistible $5.99. I own this album already, but if I were to buy it today, I’d obviously grab the DRM-free version from AmazonMP3.

I have a feeling it’s not just DRM that has just taken a huge beat-down today, but also the idea of static pricing.

[update 2]

Daring Fireball concurs with my assessment:

In just a few minutes of shopping, I found plenty of songs at Amazon that are only available from the iTunes Store with DRM. Given the Amazon MP3 Store’s audio quality, prices, and user experience, I can’t see why anyone would buy DRM-restricted music from iTunes that’s available from Amazon. And given that Amazon is quite a bit cheaper than iTunes Plus, you might as well check Amazon first. I plan to. (Amazon’s biggest shortcoming compared to iTunes might not be the selection, but the fact that it’s currently limited only to the U.S.)

The Amazon MP3 Store is clearly the biggest and best rival to the iTunes Store. It’s not a coincidence that they’ve eschewed DRM completely.

« Older entries